<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Patent Reform Act of 2010:  A Substitute S. 515</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2010/03/05/the-patent-reform-act-of-2010-a-substitute-s-515/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2010/03/05/the-patent-reform-act-of-2010-a-substitute-s-515/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-patent-reform-act-of-2010-a-substitute-s-515</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Stop Me If You&#8217;ve Heard This Before&#8230;There&#8217;s a Patent Reform Act of 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2010/03/05/the-patent-reform-act-of-2010-a-substitute-s-515/comment-page-1/#comment-79401</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Stop Me If You&#8217;ve Heard This Before&#8230;There&#8217;s a Patent Reform Act of 2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2726#comment-79401</guid>
		<description>[...] excited about this, don&#8217;t forget we&#8217;ve already had the Patent Reform Act of 2011, the Patent Reform Act of 2010, the Patent Reform Act of 2009, the Patent Reform Act of 2008, the Patent Reform Act of 2007 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] excited about this, don&#8217;t forget we&#8217;ve already had the Patent Reform Act of 2011, the Patent Reform Act of 2010, the Patent Reform Act of 2009, the Patent Reform Act of 2008, the Patent Reform Act of 2007 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IPblog &#124; Intellectual Property Law in Canada &#187; Business Method Patents: Amazon Clicks Through</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2010/03/05/the-patent-reform-act-of-2010-a-substitute-s-515/comment-page-1/#comment-75951</link>
		<dc:creator>IPblog &#124; Intellectual Property Law in Canada &#187; Business Method Patents: Amazon Clicks Through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2726#comment-75951</guid>
		<description>[...] In the US, we&#8217;re watching the proposed Patent Reform Act of 2010, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the US, we&#8217;re watching the proposed Patent Reform Act of 2010, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New &#38; Improved Patent Reform Act Of 2010 &#171; Innovators Network Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2010/03/05/the-patent-reform-act-of-2010-a-substitute-s-515/comment-page-1/#comment-71745</link>
		<dc:creator>The New &#38; Improved Patent Reform Act Of 2010 &#171; Innovators Network Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2726#comment-71745</guid>
		<description>[...] In a fantastically thorough and meaty piece, Head Patent Barista Stephen Albainy-Jenei dissects The Patent Reform Act of 2010: A Substitute S. 515 and reveals, to general dismay, that &quot;It’s like Apple’s Get-a-Mac ad that talks about all the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a fantastically thorough and meaty piece, Head Patent Barista Stephen Albainy-Jenei dissects The Patent Reform Act of 2010: A Substitute S. 515 and reveals, to general dismay, that &quot;It’s like Apple’s Get-a-Mac ad that talks about all the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: staff</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2010/03/05/the-patent-reform-act-of-2010-a-substitute-s-515/comment-page-1/#comment-71742</link>
		<dc:creator>staff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2726#comment-71742</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Amendment to S. 515 seems to meet the goal of establishing a simpler, objectively-based, transparent patent system that can eliminate patents that should not have issued and speed the processing of patents that should be issued.&quot;

Not by a long shot.

Patent reform is a fraud on America. It is patently un-American.
Please see http://truereform.piausa.org/ for a different/opposing view on patent reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Amendment to S. 515 seems to meet the goal of establishing a simpler, objectively-based, transparent patent system that can eliminate patents that should not have issued and speed the processing of patents that should be issued.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not by a long shot.</p>
<p>Patent reform is a fraud on America. It is patently un-American.<br />
Please see <a href="http://truereform.piausa.org/" rel="nofollow">http://truereform.piausa.org/</a> for a different/opposing view on patent reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.G. Maué</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2010/03/05/the-patent-reform-act-of-2010-a-substitute-s-515/comment-page-1/#comment-71738</link>
		<dc:creator>P.G. Maué</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2726#comment-71738</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Stephen, for your analysis to which I largely subscribe. Your analysis positively contrasts with the emotionally written comments which, in my view, try to cover up the commercial interests of some members of our profession (wrting non-infringement opinions for 100&#039;000USD, for example). Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Stephen, for your analysis to which I largely subscribe. Your analysis positively contrasts with the emotionally written comments which, in my view, try to cover up the commercial interests of some members of our profession (wrting non-infringement opinions for 100&#8217;000USD, for example). Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.patentbaristas.com @ 2012-02-12 19:54:28 -->
