<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: What&#8217;s Your Favorite Quote from Bilski?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/11/poll-whats-your-favorite-quote-from-bilski/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/11/poll-whats-your-favorite-quote-from-bilski/</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:54:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Morriss</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/11/poll-whats-your-favorite-quote-from-bilski/comment-page-1/#comment-69563</link>
		<dc:creator>William Morriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2350#comment-69563</guid>
		<description>I personally loved Justic Scalia&#039;s dismissal of the concept that transforming a signal in&#039;t a physical transformation.  Too bad it came in oral arguments, rather than a holding.

JUSTICE SCALIA: Well, it was -- it was transforming sound into electrical current and then at the other end electrical current back into sound. I mean it met the transformation test, didn&#039;t it? 

MR. JAKES: It might have. It might have. 

JUSTICE SCALIA: It clearly did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally loved Justic Scalia&#8217;s dismissal of the concept that transforming a signal in&#8217;t a physical transformation.  Too bad it came in oral arguments, rather than a holding.</p>
<p>JUSTICE SCALIA: Well, it was &#8212; it was transforming sound into electrical current and then at the other end electrical current back into sound. I mean it met the transformation test, didn&#8217;t it? </p>
<p>MR. JAKES: It might have. It might have. </p>
<p>JUSTICE SCALIA: It clearly did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/11/poll-whats-your-favorite-quote-from-bilski/comment-page-1/#comment-69558</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2350#comment-69558</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by JewelryHoncho: Poll: What&#039;s Your Favorite Quote from Bilski? http://bit.ly/3I8H7G...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by JewelryHoncho: Poll: What&#8217;s Your Favorite Quote from Bilski? <a href="http://bit.ly/3I8H7G.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3I8H7G..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
