<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Ponders Hypotheticals In Bilski</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/10/supreme-court-ponders-hypotheticals-in-bilski/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/10/supreme-court-ponders-hypotheticals-in-bilski/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-court-ponders-hypotheticals-in-bilski</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manchester Solicitors</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/10/supreme-court-ponders-hypotheticals-in-bilski/comment-page-1/#comment-72075</link>
		<dc:creator>Manchester Solicitors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2336#comment-72075</guid>
		<description>Hi vey nice interesting blog im from manchester i found this on msn i found this blog very interesting good luck with it i will return to this blog soon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi vey nice interesting blog im from manchester i found this on msn i found this blog very interesting good luck with it i will return to this blog soon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Poll: What&#8217;s Your Favorite Quote from Bilski?</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/10/supreme-court-ponders-hypotheticals-in-bilski/comment-page-1/#comment-69555</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Poll: What&#8217;s Your Favorite Quote from Bilski?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2336#comment-69555</guid>
		<description>[...] Supreme Court finally heard oral arguments in the Bilski v. Doll case and everyone has something to say about it. Whether the Court will make a narrow ruling on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Supreme Court finally heard oral arguments in the Bilski v. Doll case and everyone has something to say about it. Whether the Court will make a narrow ruling on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Webcast: Patentable Subject Matter After the Bilski Oral Argument</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/10/supreme-court-ponders-hypotheticals-in-bilski/comment-page-1/#comment-69553</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Webcast: Patentable Subject Matter After the Bilski Oral Argument</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2336#comment-69553</guid>
		<description>[...] Bilski v. Kappos, the U.S. Supreme Court addresses limitations on patentable subject matter in the context of a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bilski v. Kappos, the U.S. Supreme Court addresses limitations on patentable subject matter in the context of a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/10/supreme-court-ponders-hypotheticals-in-bilski/comment-page-1/#comment-69552</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2336#comment-69552</guid>
		<description>Search for patents on horse drawn carriages, on controlling horses, and on training horses and you will find plenty of them.  Scalia was right, he just didn&#039;t know it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search for patents on horse drawn carriages, on controlling horses, and on training horses and you will find plenty of them.  Scalia was right, he just didn&#8217;t know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Patent Baristas » Supreme Court Ponders Hypotheticals In Bilski -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/10/supreme-court-ponders-hypotheticals-in-bilski/comment-page-1/#comment-69548</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Patent Baristas » Supreme Court Ponders Hypotheticals In Bilski -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2336#comment-69548</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gregory Bufithis and Gwynne Monahan, PriorSmart. PriorSmart said: Just read: Supreme Court Ponders Hypotheticals In Bilski - http://u.nu/44vt3 {at patentbaristas} #patent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gregory Bufithis and Gwynne Monahan, PriorSmart. PriorSmart said: Just read: Supreme Court Ponders Hypotheticals In Bilski &#8211; <a href="http://u.nu/44vt3" rel="nofollow">http://u.nu/44vt3</a> {at patentbaristas} #patent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.patentbaristas.com @ 2012-02-12 19:16:45 -->
