Comments on: ACLU/PUBPAT Gene Patent Challenge Moves Ahead http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/03/aclupubpat-gene-patent-challenge-moves-ahead/ Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily. Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:54:35 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Patent Baristas » BulletProof: Interview with ACLU Attorney Chris Hansen over Gene Patents http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/03/aclupubpat-gene-patent-challenge-moves-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-69554 Patent Baristas » BulletProof: Interview with ACLU Attorney Chris Hansen over Gene Patents Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:10:35 +0000 http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2320#comment-69554 [...] Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, et al., a suit by the American Civil Liberties Union and joined by the Public Patent Foundation, challenges the patentability of gene patents on two human genes associated with breast and ovarian cancer.  Along with claims that the patents are illegal, the group charges that they restrict scientific research and patient access to medical care, the suit contends that patents on human genes violate First Amendment and patent law because genes are “products of nature.” [...] [...] Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, et al., a suit by the American Civil Liberties Union and joined by the Public Patent Foundation, challenges the patentability of gene patents on two human genes associated with breast and ovarian cancer.  Along with claims that the patents are illegal, the group charges that they restrict scientific research and patient access to medical care, the suit contends that patents on human genes violate First Amendment and patent law because genes are “products of nature.” [...]

]]> By: JOLT Digest » Assn. for Molecular Pathology v. USPTO | Harvard Journal of Law & Technology http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/03/aclupubpat-gene-patent-challenge-moves-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-69547 JOLT Digest » Assn. for Molecular Pathology v. USPTO | Harvard Journal of Law & Technology Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:27:06 +0000 http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2320#comment-69547 [...] of the case.  The ACLU, who represents the plaintiffs, writes in support of the decision.  Patent Baristas put forward a more skeptical view of the plaintiffs’ prospects. Patent Docs features a longer [...] [...] of the case.  The ACLU, who represents the plaintiffs, writes in support of the decision.  Patent Baristas put forward a more skeptical view of the plaintiffs’ prospects. Patent Docs features a longer [...]

]]> By: Patents Roundup: Supreme Court Paywalls Raised as Bilski (Re)Starts, Microsoft Patent Lawsuits, EU Community Patent | Boycott Novell http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/03/aclupubpat-gene-patent-challenge-moves-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-69545 Patents Roundup: Supreme Court Paywalls Raised as Bilski (Re)Starts, Microsoft Patent Lawsuits, EU Community Patent | Boycott Novell Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:42:39 +0000 http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2320#comment-69545 [...] Patent Baristas: A federal district court said that the ACLU et al. suit challenging the patentability of gene [...] [...] Patent Baristas: A federal district court said that the ACLU et al. suit challenging the patentability of gene [...]

]]> By: Administrator http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/11/03/aclupubpat-gene-patent-challenge-moves-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-69543 Administrator Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:09:05 +0000 http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=2320#comment-69543 Sorry, comments had been accidentally disabled. They should now be fully functioning. Ed. Sorry, comments had been accidentally disabled. They should now be fully functioning.

Ed.

]]>