<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The More You Know, The More You Trust Bayer.  Unfortunately, Their Patent is Still Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/08/06/the-more-you-know-the-more-you-trust-bayer-unfortunately-their-patent-is-stil-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/08/06/the-more-you-know-the-more-you-trust-bayer-unfortunately-their-patent-is-stil-dead/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-more-you-know-the-more-you-trust-bayer-unfortunately-their-patent-is-stil-dead</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: katreena</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/08/06/the-more-you-know-the-more-you-trust-bayer-unfortunately-their-patent-is-stil-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-69399</link>
		<dc:creator>katreena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=1968#comment-69399</guid>
		<description>awesome article...keep it up.
Good &lt;a href=&quot;http://inventiontopatents.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;patent&lt;/a&gt; information provided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome article&#8230;keep it up.<br />
Good <a href="http://inventiontopatents.com/" rel="nofollow">patent</a> information provided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/08/06/the-more-you-know-the-more-you-trust-bayer-unfortunately-their-patent-is-stil-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-69335</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=1968#comment-69335</guid>
		<description>I find it astounding that the Federal Circuit would hold the claims at issue here obvious, when Bayer worked for five years under the reasonable assumption that the patented formulation would not work.  In essence, the Federal Circuit has substituted its scientific judgement for that of the Bayer scientists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it astounding that the Federal Circuit would hold the claims at issue here obvious, when Bayer worked for five years under the reasonable assumption that the patented formulation would not work.  In essence, the Federal Circuit has substituted its scientific judgement for that of the Bayer scientists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrea Pabst</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/08/06/the-more-you-know-the-more-you-trust-bayer-unfortunately-their-patent-is-stil-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-69331</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrea Pabst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=1968#comment-69331</guid>
		<description>we are clearly in an anti-patent environment. a few months ago examiners were allowing applications - no more. nothing but non-sensical 112 rejections and prior art rejections, all citing to the kind of decision from the courts we see in Bayer.  it is terrible for our industry and ultimately, the public who will not see new drugs and methods of health care as a result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we are clearly in an anti-patent environment. a few months ago examiners were allowing applications &#8211; no more. nothing but non-sensical 112 rejections and prior art rejections, all citing to the kind of decision from the courts we see in Bayer.  it is terrible for our industry and ultimately, the public who will not see new drugs and methods of health care as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.patentbaristas.com @ 2012-02-13 02:24:29 -->
