<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unpredictable Nature of Chemicals Can Defeat Obviousness Claim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/05/29/unpredictable-nature-of-chemicals-can-defeat-obviousness-claim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/05/29/unpredictable-nature-of-chemicals-can-defeat-obviousness-claim/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=unpredictable-nature-of-chemicals-can-defeat-obviousness-claim</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpredictable Nature of Chemicals Can Defeat Obviousness Claim &#124; Arts</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/05/29/unpredictable-nature-of-chemicals-can-defeat-obviousness-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-69035</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpredictable Nature of Chemicals Can Defeat Obviousness Claim &#124; Arts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=1658#comment-69035</guid>
		<description>[...] Unpredictable Nature of Chemicals Can Defeat Obviousness Claim        After a final judgment upholding the validity of the Procter &amp; Gamble Company U.S. Patent 5,583,122 , Teva Pharmaceuticals appealed to the US United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit claiming invalidity defenses of obviousness and obviousness-type double patenting.  It fell on deaf ears as the Federal Circuit affirmed the validity. P&amp;G v. Teva Pharma (08-1404-1406) . The ’122 patent claims the compound risedronate, the active ingredient of P&amp;G’s osteoporosis dru     Original post by Unpredictable Nature of Chemicals Can Defeat Obviousness Claim [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unpredictable Nature of Chemicals Can Defeat Obviousness Claim        After a final judgment upholding the validity of the Procter &amp; Gamble Company U.S. Patent 5,583,122 , Teva Pharmaceuticals appealed to the US United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit claiming invalidity defenses of obviousness and obviousness-type double patenting.  It fell on deaf ears as the Federal Circuit affirmed the validity. P&amp;G v. Teva Pharma (08-1404-1406) . The ’122 patent claims the compound risedronate, the active ingredient of P&amp;G’s osteoporosis dru     Original post by Unpredictable Nature of Chemicals Can Defeat Obviousness Claim [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.patentbaristas.com @ 2012-02-13 00:53:32 -->
