<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOJ Antitrust Division Shifts to More Aggressive Approach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/05/12/doj-antitrust-division-shifts-to-more-aggressive-approach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/05/12/doj-antitrust-division-shifts-to-more-aggressive-approach/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=doj-antitrust-division-shifts-to-more-aggressive-approach</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; FTC Position on Reverse Payments: Settlements Can Be Procompetitive</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/05/12/doj-antitrust-division-shifts-to-more-aggressive-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-68326</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; FTC Position on Reverse Payments: Settlements Can Be Procompetitive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/?p=1567#comment-68326</guid>
		<description>[...] a follow-up to an earlier discussion about the shift in position by the DOJ’s Antitrust Division, which has withdrawn a September report that “raised too many hurdles to government antitrust [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a follow-up to an earlier discussion about the shift in position by the DOJ’s Antitrust Division, which has withdrawn a September report that “raised too many hurdles to government antitrust [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.patentbaristas.com @ 2012-02-12 23:54:18 -->
