<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Introduced to Prohibit the Marketing of Authorized Generic Drugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/02/06/bill-introduced-to-prohibit-the-marketing-of-authorized-generic-drugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/02/06/bill-introduced-to-prohibit-the-marketing-of-authorized-generic-drugs/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bill-introduced-to-prohibit-the-marketing-of-authorized-generic-drugs</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOJ Hits Pfizer with $2.3B Bill &#124; Technology Boss</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/02/06/bill-introduced-to-prohibit-the-marketing-of-authorized-generic-drugs/comment-page-1/#comment-69501</link>
		<dc:creator>DOJ Hits Pfizer with $2.3B Bill &#124; Technology Boss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/02/06/bill-introduced-to-prohibit-the-marketing-of-authorized-generic-drugs/#comment-69501</guid>
		<description>[...] Bill Introduced to Prohibit the Marketing of Authorized Generic Drugs The 1984 Hatch-Waxman Act combined the 180-day duration of exclusivity&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bill Introduced to Prohibit the Marketing of Authorized Generic Drugs The 1984 Hatch-Waxman Act combined the 180-day duration of exclusivity&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senthilkumar</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/02/06/bill-introduced-to-prohibit-the-marketing-of-authorized-generic-drugs/comment-page-1/#comment-65548</link>
		<dc:creator>Senthilkumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 09:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2009/02/06/bill-introduced-to-prohibit-the-marketing-of-authorized-generic-drugs/#comment-65548</guid>
		<description>While the bills addressed two aspects of circumventing the Hatch-Waxmann act namely Reverse Payments, and Authorized Generics, the are other unjustified means of delaying the generic entry.  At the end of patent expiry, certain brand companies introduce minor modification of the original formulation, get approval from the agency, withdraw the original formulation from market, and file a petition with FDA that the generic formulation referencing the original formulation should no longer be approved.  Hence, there would be substantial delay from the agency to conclude on the petition, during which time the monopoly is maintaine by the brand, as no generic was approved even after the expiry of the patent.  Since the new formulation with minor change in formulation is patented, it would amount to extending the monopoly for several years !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the bills addressed two aspects of circumventing the Hatch-Waxmann act namely Reverse Payments, and Authorized Generics, the are other unjustified means of delaying the generic entry.  At the end of patent expiry, certain brand companies introduce minor modification of the original formulation, get approval from the agency, withdraw the original formulation from market, and file a petition with FDA that the generic formulation referencing the original formulation should no longer be approved.  Hence, there would be substantial delay from the agency to conclude on the petition, during which time the monopoly is maintaine by the brand, as no generic was approved even after the expiry of the patent.  Since the new formulation with minor change in formulation is patented, it would amount to extending the monopoly for several years !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.patentbaristas.com @ 2012-02-13 01:26:37 -->
