<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oral Arguments Get Laughs in Continuation Rules Appeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/12/06/oral-arguments-get-laughs-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/12/06/oral-arguments-get-laughs-in/</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:32:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Wegner&#8217;s Top Ten Patent Cases in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/12/06/oral-arguments-get-laughs-in/comment-page-1/#comment-65326</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Wegner&#8217;s Top Ten Patent Cases in 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/12/06/oral-arguments-get-laughs-in/#comment-65326</guid>
		<description>[...] Tafas v. Dudas: – concerns the appeal of the claims and continuations rules promulgated by the USPTO which were [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tafas v. Dudas: – concerns the appeal of the claims and continuations rules promulgated by the USPTO which were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
