Comments on: Merck to Apotex: No Harm No Foul

By: Susan Tees

Susan Tees — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:58:02 +0000

Thanks for posting the story, Stephen.

By: Stephen Albainy-Jenei

Stephen Albainy-Jenei — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:15:59 +0000

PR,

Thanks for your note. You’re correct, it’s Fosamax (the Fed Cir opinion had it as Fosomax and I copied their error). Interestingly, a Google search shows 199,000 hits with Fosomax.

Also, this note would have been earlier but I wrote up the review and then got busy and forgot to post it. I posted it this week figuring that was better than deleting it.

Ed.

By: Pacific Reporter

Pacific Reporter — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:55:03 +0000

I assume you mean “Fosamax.” And you’re late to the story. http://www.orangebookblog.com/2008/07/federal-circuit-vacates-dismissal-of-delaratory-judgment-counterclaims-in-fosamax-case-as-moot.html