Comments on: Is the USPTO Trying to Put Itself In A Better Light On Appeal? http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/08/12/is-the-uspto-trying-to-put-itself-in-a-better-light-on-appeal/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=is-the-uspto-trying-to-put-itself-in-a-better-light-on-appeal Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily. Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:57:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Recent Links Tagged With "continuations" - JabberTags http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/08/12/is-the-uspto-trying-to-put-itself-in-a-better-light-on-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-65010 Recent Links Tagged With "continuations" - JabberTags Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:19:36 +0000 http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/08/12/is-the-uspto-trying-to-put-itself-in-a-better-light-on-appeal/#comment-65010 [...] public links >> continuations Is the USPTO Trying to Put Itself In A Better Light On Appeal? Saved by chukh1 on Sun 02-11-2008 Meeting September 11th Saved by xee on Mon 06-10-2008 re: [...] [...] public links >> continuations Is the USPTO Trying to Put Itself In A Better Light On Appeal? Saved by chukh1 on Sun 02-11-2008 Meeting September 11th Saved by xee on Mon 06-10-2008 re: [...]

]]> By: T http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/08/12/is-the-uspto-trying-to-put-itself-in-a-better-light-on-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-59732 T Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:39:55 +0000 http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/08/12/is-the-uspto-trying-to-put-itself-in-a-better-light-on-appeal/#comment-59732 Interestingly the notice indicates that a reason for the notice is that the Office is concerned that some applicants may be taking preparatory action anticipating the new requirements of 37 CFR 1.78(f)(1) and (2), as added by the Claims and Continuations Final Rule, due to the possibility that the injunction by the district court in Tafas will be removed. Why is the Office so concerned? Didn't the office tell OMB that such preparation would take no time and have not costs associated with them? Interestingly the notice indicates that a reason for the notice is that the Office is concerned that some applicants may be taking preparatory action anticipating the new requirements of 37 CFR 1.78(f)(1) and (2), as added by the Claims and Continuations Final Rule, due to the possibility that the injunction by the district court in Tafas will be removed.

Why is the Office so concerned? Didn’t the office tell OMB that such preparation would take no time and have not costs associated with them?

]]>