<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor Doesn&#8217;t Apply to Device Not Subject to FDA Approval</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/08/07/hatch-waxman-safe-harbor-doesnt-apply-to-device-not-subject-to-fda-approval/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/08/07/hatch-waxman-safe-harbor-doesnt-apply-to-device-not-subject-to-fda-approval/</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:54:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Websites tagged "barriers" on Postsaver</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/08/07/hatch-waxman-safe-harbor-doesnt-apply-to-device-not-subject-to-fda-approval/comment-page-1/#comment-60425</link>
		<dc:creator>Websites tagged "barriers" on Postsaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/08/07/hatch-waxman-safe-harbor-doesnt-apply-to-device-not-subject-to-fda-approval/#comment-60425</guid>
		<description>[...] - ED - Erectile Dysfunction - Understanding the Myths saved by coryke2008-08-16 - Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor Doesn’t Apply to Device Not Subject to... saved by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; ED &#8211; Erectile Dysfunction &#8211; Understanding the Myths saved by coryke2008-08-16 &#8211; Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor Doesn’t Apply to Device Not Subject to&#8230; saved by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor Doesn’t Apply to Device Not Subject to FDA Approval</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/08/07/hatch-waxman-safe-harbor-doesnt-apply-to-device-not-subject-to-fda-approval/comment-page-1/#comment-59246</link>
		<dc:creator>Hatch-Waxman Safe Harbor Doesn’t Apply to Device Not Subject to FDA Approval</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/08/07/hatch-waxman-safe-harbor-doesnt-apply-to-device-not-subject-to-fda-approval/#comment-59246</guid>
		<description>[...] Patent Baristas                   Copyright &#169; business loan         sc_project=3641399; sc_invisible=1; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Patent Baristas                   Copyright &copy; business loan         sc_project=3641399; sc_invisible=1; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
