<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Synergy Won&#8217;t Save Patent Term Extension For Combination of Known Drugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/07/28/synergy-wont-save-patent-term-extension-for-combination-of-known-drugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/07/28/synergy-wont-save-patent-term-extension-for-combination-of-known-drugs/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=synergy-wont-save-patent-term-extension-for-combination-of-known-drugs</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Turner MD MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/07/28/synergy-wont-save-patent-term-extension-for-combination-of-known-drugs/comment-page-1/#comment-58504</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Turner MD MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/07/28/synergy-wont-save-patent-term-extension-for-combination-of-known-drugs/#comment-58504</guid>
		<description>In house counsel was fortunate that the patent term extension was invalidated on two points.  The invalidation of the patent because the first commercial use of both ingredients having already occurred was a Godsend to counsel.  Missing a filing date deadline by one day (the second reason given for invalidation) would have cost the attorney his job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In house counsel was fortunate that the patent term extension was invalidated on two points.  The invalidation of the patent because the first commercial use of both ingredients having already occurred was a Godsend to counsel.  Missing a filing date deadline by one day (the second reason given for invalidation) would have cost the attorney his job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.patentbaristas.com @ 2012-02-13 01:34:44 -->
