By: Blogger Appreciation Day IP Down Under

Blogger Appreciation Day IP Down Under — Sun, 18 May 2008 04:13:31 +0000

[...] so firstly, thanks to Securing Innovation and Patent Baristas who mentioned IP Think Tank in their appreciation posts – thanks [...]

By: Law Bites » Blogger Appreciation Day

Law Bites » Blogger Appreciation Day — Sun, 11 May 2008 02:16:21 +0000

[...] so firstly, thanks to Securing Innovation and Patent Baristas who mentioned IP Think Tank in their appreciation posts – thanks [...]

By: problogger

problogger — Fri, 09 May 2008 10:44:15 +0000

[...] declared today Blogger Appreciation Day and has asked readers to email another blogger to let …http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/14/blogger-appreciation-day/The Secret to Developing a Popular Blog Search Engine JournalBuilding a blog that will get a wide [...]

By: F.Paul

F.Paul — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:28:33 +0000

I`d like to convey my appreciation to Senator Jeff Sessions. What a guy!
Subject, Senator Jeff Sessions, honesty, justice and integrity. (Tell it like it is)!
An amendment to the Patent Reform Bill, sponsored by Senator Jeff Sessions, has been withdrawn by the Senator himself. The amendment, received approval from the entire Senate Judiciary Committee. It had the backing of (The Coalition for Patent Fairness) – (fairness by definition – freedom from dishonesty and injustice). The coalition, a group of one hundred and fifty high-tech companies, was, backed by (The Financial Round Table.) The Financial Round Table, represents the countries one hundred largest banks. These banks, now have a serious financial problem. (*They are presently involved in a patent infringement lawsuit*).A finding of willful infringement, will subject the banks to treble damages. (Three times the amount, that a jury would award, as per existing patent legislation.) The potential cost to the banks,? Billions of dollars! If passed, the amendment would have shift a one billion dollar expense, from the banks, to the American tax payer., By Senator Sessions own admission, “I don’t know how (the provision) can be modified to pass a constitutional muster. This Senator was attempting to add, an unconstitutional amendment, to the Patent Reform Bill. I question his motivation. I assure you, It had nothing to do with honesty, justice or a burning desire to perform his civic duty. The Senator stated,” I think this has more to do with lobbyists, than it has to do with merit”. ( Lets call a spade a spade). This action had to do with lobbyists, buying politicians! It had to do with, personal gain! It had to do with a lack of integrity! ( It had nothing to do with merit!)
(*The case, Data Treasury VS. Wells Fargo, and numerous other banks, was filed on Feb 24,2006 and is still in progress.*)——( Sorry ,their is no room in this equation for banks attempting to buy a new law because they are dissatisfied with existing patent legislation) .These guys believe ,if you have enough money, you can buy your way in or out of anything. How about we try it the old fashion way? Lets resolve this issue in court!

By: Amy

Amy — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:05:54 +0000

Another notable blog for your list: Patent Docs, http://patentdocs.typepad.com/

Comments on: Blogger Appreciation Day

By: Blogger Appreciation Day IP Down Under

By: Law Bites » Blogger Appreciation Day

By: problogger

By: F.Paul

By: Amy