Comments on: Stupiderest Patent Reform Provisions

By: Patent Baristas » The Patent Reform Act of 2010: A Substitute S. 515

Patent Baristas » The Patent Reform Act of 2010: A Substitute S. 515 — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:45:44 +0000

[...] to S. 515”). I know, you’ve heard all this before with the Patent Reform Act of 2009, the Patent Reform Act of 2008, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, the Patent Reform Act of 2006, and so on. It’s like [...]

By: Patent Baristas » Patent Reform 2009: Still Too Many Competing Interests

Patent Baristas » Patent Reform 2009: Still Too Many Competing Interests — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:37:57 +0000

[...] differing in the standard for showing inequitable conduct, the bill still retains the dreaded applicant quality submissions (AQS) that has been removed from S. 515 and H.R. [...]

By: dinnerbell

dinnerbell — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:14:04 +0000

please see http://www.piausa.org/ for a different/opposing view on patent reform

By: Patent Baristas » Friday IP Round-Up

Patent Baristas » Friday IP Round-Up — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:48:30 +0000

[...] a Patent Examiner has a rebuttal to the argument that patent reform is needed to prevent applicants from “wearing down” the Examiners. The theory is that [...]

By: identify the gatekeeper

identify the gatekeeper — Mon, 12 May 2008 01:39:54 +0000

[...] said to be working behind the scenes drafting amendments with some compromises being made on sectionhttp://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/07/stupiderest-patent-reform-provisions/Xceedium Appoints David Ballard as Vice President of Sales PR Newswire via Yahoo! Finance Xceedium, [...]