<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Joke, Court Smacks Down New Patent Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/01/no-joke-court-smacks-down-new-patent-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/01/no-joke-court-smacks-down-new-patent-rules/</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:00:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Tafas v. Doll: Preparing for the End</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/01/no-joke-court-smacks-down-new-patent-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-67555</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Tafas v. Doll: Preparing for the End</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/01/no-joke-court-smacks-down-new-patent-rules/#comment-67555</guid>
		<description>[...] saga of the PTO’s rulemaking authority continued on March 20, 2009 when the Federal Circuit issued its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] saga of the PTO’s rulemaking authority continued on March 20, 2009 when the Federal Circuit issued its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Tafas v. Dudas: The Continuation Wars</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/01/no-joke-court-smacks-down-new-patent-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-58772</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Tafas v. Dudas: The Continuation Wars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/01/no-joke-court-smacks-down-new-patent-rules/#comment-58772</guid>
		<description>[...] No Joke, Court Smacks Down New Patent Rules Patent Rule Injunction, Court To Sleep On It Examination Support Document (ESD) Could Add $26,000 to Patent Costs Is the Public Interest Really Upheld by the New USPTO Rules? Court Blocks New USPTO Rules on Continuations and Claims — For Now Patent Wars Episode II: GSK Strikes Back  Posted August 2nd, 2008 by Stephen Albainy-Jenei in Patent Reform, USPTO  &#124;  &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No Joke, Court Smacks Down New Patent Rules Patent Rule Injunction, Court To Sleep On It Examination Support Document (ESD) Could Add $26,000 to Patent Costs Is the Public Interest Really Upheld by the New USPTO Rules? Court Blocks New USPTO Rules on Continuations and Claims — For Now Patent Wars Episode II: GSK Strikes Back  Posted August 2nd, 2008 by Stephen Albainy-Jenei in Patent Reform, USPTO  |  | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WikiPatents</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/01/no-joke-court-smacks-down-new-patent-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-48469</link>
		<dc:creator>WikiPatents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/01/no-joke-court-smacks-down-new-patent-rules/#comment-48469</guid>
		<description>Search for pending patent applications &amp; issued patents at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wikipatents.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WikiPatents - Community Patent Review&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search for pending patent applications &amp; issued patents at <a href="http://www.wikipatents.com" rel="nofollow">WikiPatents &#8211; Community Patent Review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/01/no-joke-court-smacks-down-new-patent-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-47323</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/01/no-joke-court-smacks-down-new-patent-rules/#comment-47323</guid>
		<description>Rajesh not quite sure but the easiest way may be to look for the bill at thomas.gov under it&#039;s heading S. 1145 there are mark-ups at several sites, perhaps look at place like the sites for IPO and BIO with varying degrees of comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rajesh not quite sure but the easiest way may be to look for the bill at thomas.gov under it&#8217;s heading S. 1145 there are mark-ups at several sites, perhaps look at place like the sites for IPO and BIO with varying degrees of comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajesh</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/01/no-joke-court-smacks-down-new-patent-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-47125</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/01/no-joke-court-smacks-down-new-patent-rules/#comment-47125</guid>
		<description>Actually we have to look how PTO 
replies to this.
secondly can u write a blog on what is current position and what would be the changes after reform bill in details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually we have to look how PTO<br />
replies to this.<br />
secondly can u write a blog on what is current position and what would be the changes after reform bill in details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
