<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bilski: Much Ado About (almost) Nothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/06/bilski-much-ado-about-almost-nothing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/06/bilski-much-ado-about-almost-nothing/</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:00:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Supreme Court May Shake Up I.T. Patent Space, Supremely &#124; Speech Technology Magazine Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/06/bilski-much-ado-about-almost-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-69183</link>
		<dc:creator>Supreme Court May Shake Up I.T. Patent Space, Supremely &#124; Speech Technology Magazine Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/06/bilski-much-ado-about-almost-nothing/#comment-69183</guid>
		<description>[...] like Stephen Albainy-Jenei, an attorney for Frost Brown Todd, suggested in March that Bilski was &#8220;much ado about nothing&#8221; in part because &#8220;clever attorneys can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like Stephen Albainy-Jenei, an attorney for Frost Brown Todd, suggested in March that Bilski was &#8220;much ado about nothing&#8221; in part because &#8220;clever attorneys can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In re Bilski argued en banc before the Federal Circuit &#171; The En Banc Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/06/bilski-much-ado-about-almost-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-49219</link>
		<dc:creator>In re Bilski argued en banc before the Federal Circuit &#171; The En Banc Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/06/bilski-much-ado-about-almost-nothing/#comment-49219</guid>
		<description>[...] has proved to be a controversial topic among all interested parties.        &#171; Dissent from rehearing en banc on defendant&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has proved to be a controversial topic among all interested parties.        &laquo; Dissent from rehearing en banc on defendant&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: registered patent attorney, us patent office</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/06/bilski-much-ado-about-almost-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-46420</link>
		<dc:creator>registered patent attorney, us patent office</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/06/bilski-much-ado-about-almost-nothing/#comment-46420</guid>
		<description>[...] Midori Itkamrynong58594.blogspot.comBilski: Much Ado About almost Nothing - Patent BaristasToday??s post comes from Guest Barista William Morriss, a registered patent attorney in Frost Brown [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Midori Itkamrynong58594.blogspot.comBilski: Much Ado About almost Nothing &#8211; Patent BaristasToday??s post comes from Guest Barista William Morriss, a registered patent attorney in Frost Brown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; Everything Under the Sun is Patentable, Provided It Is Digitised</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/06/bilski-much-ado-about-almost-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-44668</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; Everything Under the Sun is Patentable, Provided It Is Digitised</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/06/bilski-much-ado-about-almost-nothing/#comment-44668</guid>
		<description>[...] will become hopeless unless someone intervenes. As we recently learned from Amazon, it may be true that patent applications can be warped to exploit loopholes in the USPTO. Consider this:  &#8230;the possibility of a major shift in patent law and the possible end of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will become hopeless unless someone intervenes. As we recently learned from Amazon, it may be true that patent applications can be warped to exploit loopholes in the USPTO. Consider this:  &#8230;the possibility of a major shift in patent law and the possible end of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Aharonian</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/06/bilski-much-ado-about-almost-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-44529</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Aharonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/06/bilski-much-ado-about-almost-nothing/#comment-44529</guid>
		<description>An additional reason to support your conclusions: the CAFC can&#039;t ignore Congressional acceptance of business method patents in general, by their passing into law 35 USC 273 (the prior use exemption to infringement of business method patents).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An additional reason to support your conclusions: the CAFC can&#8217;t ignore Congressional acceptance of business method patents in general, by their passing into law 35 USC 273 (the prior use exemption to infringement of business method patents).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
