<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Administration Calls For &#8220;Tech Neutral&#8221; Patent Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/05/bush-administration-calls-for-tech-neutral-patent-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/05/bush-administration-calls-for-tech-neutral-patent-reform/</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:00:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: united states post ofice</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/05/bush-administration-calls-for-tech-neutral-patent-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-50421</link>
		<dc:creator>united states post ofice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/05/bush-administration-calls-for-tech-neutral-patent-reform/#comment-50421</guid>
		<description>[...] Act of 2007??? specifically, its beef?with Section 4 on Damages, the Under Secretary of Commerchttp://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/05/bush-administration-calls-for-tech-neutral-patent-...United States Postal Service - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaWithin the united States, it is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Act of 2007??? specifically, its beef?with Section 4 on Damages, the Under Secretary of Commerchttp://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/05/bush-administration-calls-for-tech-neutral-patent-&#8230;United States Postal Service &#8211; Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaWithin the united States, it is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; Software Patents Still Chaotic, Reform Might Make Them Worse</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/05/bush-administration-calls-for-tech-neutral-patent-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-40645</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; Software Patents Still Chaotic, Reform Might Make Them Worse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/05/bush-administration-calls-for-tech-neutral-patent-reform/#comment-40645</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Majority:  This patent reform is about software companies who tries to get rid of the disadvantages of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Majority:  This patent reform is about software companies who tries to get rid of the disadvantages of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orcad</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/05/bush-administration-calls-for-tech-neutral-patent-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-40379</link>
		<dc:creator>orcad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/05/bush-administration-calls-for-tech-neutral-patent-reform/#comment-40379</guid>
		<description>This patent reform is about software companies who tries to get rid of the disadvantages of software patents, while keeping the advantages.

This is not gonna work.

The solution is to scrap software patents entirely.

This is not going to solve anything for small software companies that cannot even afford to go to court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This patent reform is about software companies who tries to get rid of the disadvantages of software patents, while keeping the advantages.</p>
<p>This is not gonna work.</p>
<p>The solution is to scrap software patents entirely.</p>
<p>This is not going to solve anything for small software companies that cannot even afford to go to court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
