<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Committee Gives Thumbs Up To Patent Reform Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/01/17/senate-committee-gives-thumbs-up-to-patent-reform-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/01/17/senate-committee-gives-thumbs-up-to-patent-reform-bill/</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:54:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott G Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/01/17/senate-committee-gives-thumbs-up-to-patent-reform-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-44240</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott G Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 04:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/01/17/senate-committee-gives-thumbs-up-to-patent-reform-bill/#comment-44240</guid>
		<description>Desperately need fast response for patents  that contribute to National Defense &amp; Terrorism.
I have one such patent, with B$$ savings, but am screwed by the system. Solution? I have gone to China to get the same treatment.
My IP lawyer is Philip T. Shannon, NYC, ask him if my invention is REAL..Wake up NOW.
Scott G Miller</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Desperately need fast response for patents  that contribute to National Defense &amp; Terrorism.<br />
I have one such patent, with B$$ savings, but am screwed by the system. Solution? I have gone to China to get the same treatment.<br />
My IP lawyer is Philip T. Shannon, NYC, ask him if my invention is REAL..Wake up NOW.<br />
Scott G Miller</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law Bites &#187; IP Think Tank Global Week in Review - 25 January 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/01/17/senate-committee-gives-thumbs-up-to-patent-reform-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-42884</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Bites &#187; IP Think Tank Global Week in Review - 25 January 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/01/17/senate-committee-gives-thumbs-up-to-patent-reform-bill/#comment-42884</guid>
		<description>[...] US Patent reform and surrounding controversy: general commentary and opinions: (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Docs), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Baristas), [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] US Patent reform and surrounding controversy: general commentary and opinions: (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Docs), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Baristas), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Bush Administration To Patent Office: Hey, Hold Up There Mister On That There Reasonable Royalty Rate</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/01/17/senate-committee-gives-thumbs-up-to-patent-reform-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-40129</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Bush Administration To Patent Office: Hey, Hold Up There Mister On That There Reasonable Royalty Rate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/01/17/senate-committee-gives-thumbs-up-to-patent-reform-bill/#comment-40129</guid>
		<description>[...] The Department of Commerce sent a letter to Sen. Patrick J. Leahy Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary, on the views of the current Administration on S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007.  The letter basically outlines the Administration&#8217;s big beef with the bill, that is, with Section 4, Right of the Inventor to Obtain Damages, in response to the committee&#8217;s report. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Department of Commerce sent a letter to Sen. Patrick J. Leahy Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary, on the views of the current Administration on S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007.  The letter basically outlines the Administration&#8217;s big beef with the bill, that is, with Section 4, Right of the Inventor to Obtain Damages, in response to the committee&#8217;s report. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
