<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patent Wars Episode II: GSK Strikes Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/10/12/patent-wars-episode-ii-gsk-strikes-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/10/12/patent-wars-episode-ii-gsk-strikes-back/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=patent-wars-episode-ii-gsk-strikes-back</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Briefs Flying In Patent Office Appeal of Continuation Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/10/12/patent-wars-episode-ii-gsk-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-64443</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Briefs Flying In Patent Office Appeal of Continuation Rules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/10/12/patent-wars-episode-ii-gsk-strikes-back/#comment-64443</guid>
		<description>[...] Upheld by the New USPTO Rules? Court Blocks New USPTO Rules on Continuations and Claims — For Now Patent Wars Episode II: GSK Strikes Back  Posted October 3rd, 2008 by Stephen Albainy-Jenei in Patent Reform, USPTO  &#124;  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Upheld by the New USPTO Rules? Court Blocks New USPTO Rules on Continuations and Claims — For Now Patent Wars Episode II: GSK Strikes Back  Posted October 3rd, 2008 by Stephen Albainy-Jenei in Patent Reform, USPTO  |  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Sides Line Up in Impending Patent Continuations Fight</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/10/12/patent-wars-episode-ii-gsk-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-36404</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Sides Line Up in Impending Patent Continuations Fight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/10/12/patent-wars-episode-ii-gsk-strikes-back/#comment-36404</guid>
		<description>[...] Triantafyllos Tafas v. Jon W. Dudas, et al. consolidated with Smithkline Beecham Corporation, et al. v. Jon W. Dudas, et al. (1:07cv1008), to enjoin enactment of the USPTO’s new rules, “Changes to Practice for Continued [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Triantafyllos Tafas v. Jon W. Dudas, et al. consolidated with Smithkline Beecham Corporation, et al. v. Jon W. Dudas, et al. (1:07cv1008), to enjoin enactment of the USPTO’s new rules, “Changes to Practice for Continued [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WCP</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/10/12/patent-wars-episode-ii-gsk-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-26883</link>
		<dc:creator>WCP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/10/12/patent-wars-episode-ii-gsk-strikes-back/#comment-26883</guid>
		<description>Kudos go to Kelley-Drye for initiating efforts to reel-in the USPTO before all of Pharma is damaged.  Unlike other IP firms Kelley-Drye immediately recognized the problem and acted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos go to Kelley-Drye for initiating efforts to reel-in the USPTO before all of Pharma is damaged.  Unlike other IP firms Kelley-Drye immediately recognized the problem and acted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WCP</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/10/12/patent-wars-episode-ii-gsk-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-26881</link>
		<dc:creator>WCP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/10/12/patent-wars-episode-ii-gsk-strikes-back/#comment-26881</guid>
		<description>Kudos goes to Kelley-Drye for initiating efforts to reel in the USPTO before all of  pharma is damaged. Unlike other IP firms, Kelley-Drye recognized the problem and acted immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos goes to Kelley-Drye for initiating efforts to reel in the USPTO before all of  pharma is damaged. Unlike other IP firms, Kelley-Drye recognized the problem and acted immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.patentbaristas.com @ 2012-02-12 14:12:57 -->
