<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Use of a Patented Formulation or Delivery Technology Safe under the FDA Research Exemption &#8220;Safe Harbor&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/08/03/is-the-use-of-a-patented-formulation-or-delivery-technology-safe-under-the-fda-research-exemption-safe-harbor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/08/03/is-the-use-of-a-patented-formulation-or-delivery-technology-safe-under-the-fda-research-exemption-safe-harbor/</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:00:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is patent gridlock keeping drugs off the market?</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/08/03/is-the-use-of-a-patented-formulation-or-delivery-technology-safe-under-the-fda-research-exemption-safe-harbor/comment-page-1/#comment-58153</link>
		<dc:creator>Is patent gridlock keeping drugs off the market?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/08/03/is-the-use-of-a-patented-formulation-or-delivery-technology-safe-under-the-fda-research-exemption-safe-harbor/#comment-58153</guid>
		<description>[...] regulatory filings. And the language of the ruling makes it look like it&#8217;s intended to cover all sorts of patented technologies as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] regulatory filings. And the language of the ruling makes it look like it&#8217;s intended to cover all sorts of patented technologies as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diala</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/08/03/is-the-use-of-a-patented-formulation-or-delivery-technology-safe-under-the-fda-research-exemption-safe-harbor/comment-page-1/#comment-45325</link>
		<dc:creator>Diala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/08/03/is-the-use-of-a-patented-formulation-or-delivery-technology-safe-under-the-fda-research-exemption-safe-harbor/#comment-45325</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

I read this article with interest and have a couple of questions which I&#039;m wondering if you have an answer to: 

1. does the research exemption safe harbor extend beyond pre-clinical studies to clinical studies ? do the same terms apply for clinical studies ?

2. does this safe harbor apply to biologics submitted via a BLA ? the article talks about INDs and NDAs submitted under the FDCA only. If it applies to biologics, how was Amgen able to sue TKT for infringement at the IND stage ?

Thanks, 

Diala</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>I read this article with interest and have a couple of questions which I&#8217;m wondering if you have an answer to: </p>
<p>1. does the research exemption safe harbor extend beyond pre-clinical studies to clinical studies ? do the same terms apply for clinical studies ?</p>
<p>2. does this safe harbor apply to biologics submitted via a BLA ? the article talks about INDs and NDAs submitted under the FDCA only. If it applies to biologics, how was Amgen able to sue TKT for infringement at the IND stage ?</p>
<p>Thanks, </p>
<p>Diala</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
