<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Myths of Doha:  Compulsory Licenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/07/27/the-myths-of-doha-compulsory-licenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/07/27/the-myths-of-doha-compulsory-licenses/</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:54:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Should Green Technology Be Subject To Compulsory Licensing?</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/07/27/the-myths-of-doha-compulsory-licenses/comment-page-1/#comment-69596</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Should Green Technology Be Subject To Compulsory Licensing?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/07/27/the-myths-of-doha-compulsory-licenses/#comment-69596</guid>
		<description>[...] idea of breaking patents is not new but compulsory licensing has to date only been used in emergency (or pseudo-emergency) situations where patent-protected [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] idea of breaking patents is not new but compulsory licensing has to date only been used in emergency (or pseudo-emergency) situations where patent-protected [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
