<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WARF Stem Cell Patents Knocked Down in Round One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/04/03/warf-stem-cell-patents-knocked-down-in-round-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/04/03/warf-stem-cell-patents-knocked-down-in-round-one/</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:32:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: USPTO Rejects WARF Stem Cell Patent Claims on Re-Examination &#124; California Biotech Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/04/03/warf-stem-cell-patents-knocked-down-in-round-one/comment-page-1/#comment-69266</link>
		<dc:creator>USPTO Rejects WARF Stem Cell Patent Claims on Re-Examination &#124; California Biotech Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/04/03/warf-stem-cell-patents-knocked-down-in-round-one/#comment-69266</guid>
		<description>[...] to the Patent Baristas, the USPTO&#8217;s decision was based on two main prior art references: (a) U.S. Pat. No. 5,166,065 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the Patent Baristas, the USPTO&#8217;s decision was based on two main prior art references: (a) U.S. Pat. No. 5,166,065 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; What a Long, Strange Trip It&#8217;s Been In 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/04/03/warf-stem-cell-patents-knocked-down-in-round-one/comment-page-1/#comment-65330</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; What a Long, Strange Trip It&#8217;s Been In 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/04/03/warf-stem-cell-patents-knocked-down-in-round-one/#comment-65330</guid>
		<description>[...] WARF Stem Cell Patents Knocked Down in Round One    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WARF Stem Cell Patents Knocked Down in Round One    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Ding! WARF Wins Round 2 As Stem Cell Patent Upheld</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/04/03/warf-stem-cell-patents-knocked-down-in-round-one/comment-page-1/#comment-44089</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Ding! WARF Wins Round 2 As Stem Cell Patent Upheld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/04/03/warf-stem-cell-patents-knocked-down-in-round-one/#comment-44089</guid>
		<description>[...] WARF Stem Cell Patents Knocked Down in Round One  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WARF Stem Cell Patents Knocked Down in Round One  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Monsanto Planted By Patent Office Re-Exam</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/04/03/warf-stem-cell-patents-knocked-down-in-round-one/comment-page-1/#comment-37221</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Monsanto Planted By Patent Office Re-Exam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/04/03/warf-stem-cell-patents-knocked-down-in-round-one/#comment-37221</guid>
		<description>[...] seems to be on a roll after successfully getting reexams of patents on Pfizer&#8217;s Lipitor, WARF&#8217;s stem cells., and Gilead [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems to be on a roll after successfully getting reexams of patents on Pfizer&#8217;s Lipitor, WARF&#8217;s stem cells., and Gilead [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Gilead Sciences Pwned by Nonprofit Activists</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/04/03/warf-stem-cell-patents-knocked-down-in-round-one/comment-page-1/#comment-36831</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Gilead Sciences Pwned by Nonprofit Activists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/04/03/warf-stem-cell-patents-knocked-down-in-round-one/#comment-36831</guid>
		<description>[...] In another challenge to patents it just doesn&#8217;t like, the nonprofit organization Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) got the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to grant a request for reexamination of four key HIV/AIDS drug patents held by Gilead Sciences Inc. PUBPAT seems to be on a roll after successfully getting reexams of patents on Pfizer&#8217;s Lipitor and WARF&#8217;s stem cells. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In another challenge to patents it just doesn&#8217;t like, the nonprofit organization Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) got the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to grant a request for reexamination of four key HIV/AIDS drug patents held by Gilead Sciences Inc. PUBPAT seems to be on a roll after successfully getting reexams of patents on Pfizer&#8217;s Lipitor and WARF&#8217;s stem cells. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
