Comments on: Harvard Drug Slaps Purdue Pharma with Antitrust Suit over OxyContin http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/03/09/harvard-drug-slaps-purdue-pharma-with-antitrust-suit-over-oxycontin/ Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily. Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:54:35 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Blawg Review #100 | hosting de calidad http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/03/09/harvard-drug-slaps-purdue-pharma-with-antitrust-suit-over-oxycontin/comment-page-1/#comment-65124 Blawg Review #100 | hosting de calidad Sun, 28 Dec 2008 05:37:53 +0000 http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/03/09/harvard-drug-slaps-purdue-pharma-with-antitrust-suit-over-oxycontin/#comment-65124 [...] those who like their bio/pharma chat freshly brewed, Patent Baristas served Blawg Review #77. This week’s coverage includes news that Harvard Drug Group has filed an antitrust class action suit against Purdue Pharma alleging an [...] [...] those who like their bio/pharma chat freshly brewed, Patent Baristas served Blawg Review #77. This week’s coverage includes news that Harvard Drug Group has filed an antitrust class action suit against Purdue Pharma alleging an [...]

]]> By: buy tramadol http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/03/09/harvard-drug-slaps-purdue-pharma-with-antitrust-suit-over-oxycontin/comment-page-1/#comment-61475 buy tramadol Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:31:33 +0000 http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/03/09/harvard-drug-slaps-purdue-pharma-with-antitrust-suit-over-oxycontin/#comment-61475 Very good article. Thanks! Very good article. Thanks!

]]> By: TJD http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/03/09/harvard-drug-slaps-purdue-pharma-with-antitrust-suit-over-oxycontin/comment-page-1/#comment-4600 TJD Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:08:38 +0000 http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/03/09/harvard-drug-slaps-purdue-pharma-with-antitrust-suit-over-oxycontin/#comment-4600 How many bites at the apple do the generics get? Final decision of the CAFC vacated the inequitable conduct filing, and the parties settled the case before the district court could issue a final ruling- so the patents are currently held valid, infringed and enforceable. This should be a slam dunk motion to dismiss, but who knows these days? How many bites at the apple do the generics get? Final decision of the CAFC vacated the inequitable conduct filing, and the parties settled the case before the district court could issue a final ruling- so the patents are currently held valid, infringed and enforceable. This should be a slam dunk motion to dismiss, but who knows these days?

]]> By: L. Ebert http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/03/09/harvard-drug-slaps-purdue-pharma-with-antitrust-suit-over-oxycontin/comment-page-1/#comment-4277 L. Ebert Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:31:18 +0000 http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/03/09/harvard-drug-slaps-purdue-pharma-with-antitrust-suit-over-oxycontin/#comment-4277 Of the inequitable conduct in the previous Endo case, what became of the CAFC interpretation: The CAFC then vacated the trial court’s judgment that the patents-in-suit are unenforceable due to inequitable conduct and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The trial court’s judgment of infringement was affirmed. [earlier patentbarista] Of the inequitable conduct in the previous Endo case, what became of the CAFC interpretation:

The CAFC then vacated the trial court’s judgment that the patents-in-suit are unenforceable due to inequitable conduct and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The trial court’s judgment of infringement was affirmed.

[earlier patentbarista]

]]>