<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More On Ariad v. Lilly re Evista, Xigris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/01/24/more-on-ariad-v-lilly-re-evista-xigris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/01/24/more-on-ariad-v-lilly-re-evista-xigris/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=more-on-ariad-v-lilly-re-evista-xigris</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Baristas &#187; Wegner&#8217;s Top Ten Patent Cases in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/01/24/more-on-ariad-v-lilly-re-evista-xigris/comment-page-1/#comment-65327</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Baristas &#187; Wegner&#8217;s Top Ten Patent Cases in 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/01/24/more-on-ariad-v-lilly-re-evista-xigris/#comment-65327</guid>
		<description>[...] issues where Lilly contends that the asserted claims of US 6,410,516 are invalid for including non-statutory subject matter, for being obtained through inequitable conduct, and are unenforceable due to prosecution laches.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] issues where Lilly contends that the asserted claims of US 6,410,516 are invalid for including non-statutory subject matter, for being obtained through inequitable conduct, and are unenforceable due to prosecution laches.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Albainy-Jenei</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/01/24/more-on-ariad-v-lilly-re-evista-xigris/comment-page-1/#comment-12049</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Albainy-Jenei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/01/24/more-on-ariad-v-lilly-re-evista-xigris/#comment-12049</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid that the judge can do whatever s/he wants -- although a judge can get reprimanded if cases get out of hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid that the judge can do whatever s/he wants &#8212; although a judge can get reprimanded if cases get out of hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Evany</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/01/24/more-on-ariad-v-lilly-re-evista-xigris/comment-page-1/#comment-5442</link>
		<dc:creator>John Evany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/01/24/more-on-ariad-v-lilly-re-evista-xigris/#comment-5442</guid>
		<description>How much longer does this judge have to come out with a decision?

Is there some sort of timeline required in which the judge HAS to make a decision?  This seems awfully long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much longer does this judge have to come out with a decision?</p>
<p>Is there some sort of timeline required in which the judge HAS to make a decision?  This seems awfully long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.patentbaristas.com @ 2012-02-12 14:10:14 -->
