Comments on: Supreme Court High-Fives MedImmune

By: Patent Baristas » Patent Office Gives Thumbs Up to Genentech’s Cabilly Patent

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:49:17 +0000

[...] the Supreme Court ruled that MedImmune could sue Genentech for patent infringement even though MedImmune continued to pay licensing fees to Genentech to use [...]

By: Patent Baristas » Want a Declaratory Judgment? Don’t Stipulate to Infringement, Validity, and Enforceability of the Patent in Question

Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:58:17 +0000

[...] MedImmune, the Supreme Court emphasized that the dispute must be: “definite and concrete, touching the [...]

By: Patent Baristas » Silence Golden For Medicis Pharma in Avoiding Judgment

Patent Baristas » Silence Golden For Medicis Pharma in Avoiding Judgment — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:40:13 +0000

[...] Supreme Court, in MedImmune v. Genentech, reaffirmed that the proper test for subject matter jurisdiction in declaratory judgment actions is [...]

By: The Invent Blog® » First Post Medimmune DJ Dismissal :: The Patent Blog of Stephen M. Nipper

Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:25:08 +0000

[...] also: Patent Baristas – Supreme Court High-Fives MedImmune, Wikipedia – MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. Print This Post | Email This Post | | [...]

By: MedImmune and Genentech Settle, Lawyers Look For New Topic of Discussion IP Down Under

Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:18:41 +0000

[...] in an attempt to overturn a Genentech patent while MedImmune continued to pay royalties to use it. Medimmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., et al. (S.Ct. No. 05–608). The patent, U.S. Patent No. 6,331,415, covers a technology that uses cell cultures to [...]