<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trial Counsel as Opinion Counsel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2006/07/26/trial-counsel-as-opinion-counsel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2006/07/26/trial-counsel-as-opinion-counsel/</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:54:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Fire of Genius</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2006/07/26/trial-counsel-as-opinion-counsel/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fire of Genius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 20:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/wp/?p=461#comment-138</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;EchoStar follow-up: Communications with trial counsel?&lt;/strong&gt;

On May 1, 2006, the Federal Circuit ruled on a mandamus petition challenging a trial court&#8217;s ruling on the scope of a waiver of attorney-client privilege and work product immunity (a waiver made to use the advice of counsel to rebut a charge that...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>EchoStar follow-up: Communications with trial counsel?</strong></p>
<p>On May 1, 2006, the Federal Circuit ruled on a mandamus petition challenging a trial court&#8217;s ruling on the scope of a waiver of attorney-client privilege and work product immunity (a waiver made to use the advice of counsel to rebut a charge that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
