<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Price of Pharmaceuticals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2006/04/18/the-price-of-pharmaceuticals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2006/04/18/the-price-of-pharmaceuticals/</link>
	<description>Freshly Brewed Bio/Pharma Chat. Served Up Daily.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:54:35 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Milind Sathe</title>
		<link>http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2006/04/18/the-price-of-pharmaceuticals/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Milind Sathe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patentbaristas.com/wp/?p=399#comment-136</guid>
		<description>When the inventive ingenuities of alleged inventors create scenes of not making full disclosure, attempts of double patenting, claiming million or multimillion possible molecular combinations by giving illustrations of even less than 10%, granting such claims by PTO, reducing the price phenominally either after loosing paraIV or on expiry of OB patent, all these factors create impression that the claimed surplus of profit is unjustifiable. The motive appears to be misappropriating public wealth, intensions are exhibited by engaging in acts far from those required by patent law, and the fact of either committing or ommitting the act completes three essential elements required to prove crime. These companies are committing a daylight crime, authenticated by national law. Unfortunately there is no provision of punishing the habitual corporate offendors. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the inventive ingenuities of alleged inventors create scenes of not making full disclosure, attempts of double patenting, claiming million or multimillion possible molecular combinations by giving illustrations of even less than 10%, granting such claims by PTO, reducing the price phenominally either after loosing paraIV or on expiry of OB patent, all these factors create impression that the claimed surplus of profit is unjustifiable. The motive appears to be misappropriating public wealth, intensions are exhibited by engaging in acts far from those required by patent law, and the fact of either committing or ommitting the act completes three essential elements required to prove crime. These companies are committing a daylight crime, authenticated by national law. Unfortunately there is no provision of punishing the habitual corporate offendors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
